Overview
The latest Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) results, released in 2023, reveal a troubling reversal: after more than a decade of slow progress toward gender equity in math, the gap between boys and girls is widening again—and it's striking. Fourth-grade boys outperform girls in the vast majority of participating countries, and among eighth-graders the rate of boys scoring higher has increased exponentially since 2019. This guide helps educators, policymakers, and researchers understand the data, identify root causes, and take evidence-based action. We'll walk through the key findings, analyze the pandemic's role, and outline practical steps to close the gap.

Prerequisites
Before diving into the analysis, ensure you have:
- Access to TIMSS reports (available at TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center).
- Basic understanding of educational metrics (e.g., proficiency levels, standard deviation, gender gap index).
- Familiarity with data visualization tools (Excel, Tableau, or R) if you plan to recreate the graphs.
- Awareness of national context—each country's school closure policies and socioeconomic factors vary.
Step-by-Step Instructions
Step 1: Understand the TIMSS Framework
TIMSS measures math and science achievement for fourth- and eighth-grade students every four years. The 2023 cycle is the first post-pandemic assessment. Key metrics include:
- Average scale score (centered at 500 with a standard deviation of 100).
- Gender gap (average boy score minus average girl score).
- Proficiency benchmarks: Low (400), Intermediate (475), High (550), Advanced (625).
Download the 2023 international database and filter by grade and gender. Note that TIMSS reports results at the country level, but also provides regional breakdowns.
Step 2: Examine Fourth-Grade Gender Gaps
In 2023, fourth-grade boys outperformed girls in 85% of participating regions. To analyze:
- Sort countries by the gender gap magnitude.
- Identify which countries had a prior trend of narrowing gaps (e.g., pre-2019 data).
- Look at the share of students at each proficiency level. The new data shows that the proportion of regions where more girls than boys fall below the "Low" benchmark is rising.
Example code snippet (Python/pandas):
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv('timss_2023_grade4.csv')
gap = df.groupby('country').apply(lambda x: x[x['gender']=='male']['score'].mean() - x[x['gender']=='female']['score'].mean())
gap_sorted = gap.sort_values(ascending=False)
print(gap_sorted.head(10))
Step 3: Examine Eighth-Grade Gender Gaps
The eighth-grade gap is even more concerning. The rate of boys outperforming girls increased exponentially since 2019. Steps:
- Compare the 2019 and 2023 gender gap distributions across countries.
- Calculate the percentage of countries where the gap increased vs. decreased.
- Identify outliers—countries where girls still do better (none, according to the report).
Key finding: In 2023, over 50% of countries have an advanced achievement gap (at the 625 benchmark) favoring boys; zero favor girls.
Step 4: Correlate Gender Gaps with Pandemic School Closures
Matthias Eck from UNESCO suggests a link between longer school closures and larger learning losses for girls. To test this:
- Collect UNESCO data on the duration of school closures per country (in weeks).
- Run a correlation analysis between closure length and the change in gender gap from 2019 to 2023.
- Control for GDP, internet access, and pre-pandemic gender gap.
Hypothesis: Disrupted learning environments affected girls' confidence and opportunities more than boys'.

Step 5: Identify At-Risk Subgroups
Drill down into the data to find which girls are falling behind:
- Look at performance by socioeconomic status (free/reduced lunch proxy).
- Cross-tabulate gender with urban/rural location.
- Analyze trends among top performers vs. low achievers.
In fourth grade, the gender gap among low achievers (below basic) is growing—more struggling girls than boys. In eighth grade, though the overall gap for low achievers is shrinking, the proportion of countries where girls fail more is spiking.
Step 6: Formulate Evidence-Based Interventions
Use your analysis to design targeted strategies:
- For elementary schools: Invest in math confidence programs, reduce stereotype threat, and provide extra support for girls at risk of falling below basic proficiency.
- For middle schools: Create mentorship programs, ensure advanced math tracks are accessible to girls, and address systemic biases in teacher expectations.
- Policy-level: Prioritize equitable school reopening plans, invest in remote learning infrastructure during crises, and collect disaggregated data to monitor progress.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming the pandemic is the sole cause. The data shows a correlation, not causation. Other factors (curriculum changes, testing conditions) may contribute.
- Ignoring the variability across countries. Some nations narrowed gaps even during COVID; blindly applying one solution fails.
- Focusing only on average scores. The biggest gaps may be at the tails (advanced or below basic). Always examine distribution.
- Not using prior trend data. Without comparing to 2015 and 2019, you might miss the long-term reversal.
- Overlooking the confidence factor. Eck notes girls' confidence may have dropped; interventions must address affective as well as cognitive skills.
Summary
The 2023 TIMSS data delivers a clear warning: global math gains for girls are slipping. Fourth-grade boys now lead in most countries, and eighth-grade boys have extended their advantage exponentially since 2019. By systematically analyzing the data—understanding the framework, disaggregating by grade and proficiency level, correlating with school closures, and identifying at-risk groups—we can pinpoint the most effective interventions. The pandemic may have exacerbated pre-existing inequalities, but targeted, evidence-based policies can reverse the trend. As Eck emphasizes, the goal is not just parity but ensuring every child, regardless of gender, reaches their full potential in math. Use this guide as a starting point to turn data into action.